MAN!!
My current
Robert Eggers filmography rankings (sans 2024’s Nosferatu, which I
haven’t seen): The Northman (2022), The Lighthouse (2019), The
VVitch (2015). In terms of his “The” trilogy, I think the one I watched
most recently takes the top spot, though I will admit this is somewhat unfair
to VVitch since I haven’t seen it in quite a while. Lighthouse is
probably my “favorite,” and I’m not sure if he can top it—As a weird, moody
Little Tale and as a claustrophobic showcase for Willem Dafoe’s and Robert
Pattinson’s dueling performances, it may be unbeatable, especially by a film as
“big” as Northman (or as Nosferatu seems to be). My shameful
secret is that I am not immune to big stuff, however. I must needs admit that I
took strongly to this movie in part because it does offer the sturdy certainty
of familiar narrative beats arranged in comfortable ways. I love The
Lighthouse as a whole, but I wouldn’t call its ending “satisfying,” for
example. Meanwhile, The Northman is a pleasing, predictable action movie
with a little bit of an edge, if I had to evaluate it succinctly.
What The
Northman does is essentially compromise between accessibility and mood. In
wholly practical terms, that’s what it undoubtedly takes to get a movie made at
this scale, but I’m also speaking spiritually. Internally, in terms of its
inner self, it has a foot in both worlds: that of easy pleasures (revenge,
combat, sex, gore) and that of artisticism, weirdography. I do like that
it front-loads some of the latter, with the eventual-revenger Amleth and his
father pretending to be dogs and then proving they aren’t dogs, at Willem
Dafoe’s urging, by burping and farting before taking a ritualistic father-son
drug trip together so that Amleth can see the heart-blood tree that represents
his lineage and can inherit the onus of the ruler (just in time for his
treacherous uncle’s coup that forces him into exile). The phrase “rent-lowering
gunshots” popped into my head during the aforementioned scene and at other
points in the film, typically when someone was looking uncannily at me
through the screen. I like that there’s a sort of trial-by-fire, stylistically,
for… Co-Worker and/or RETVRN types who might go into this to see some blood and
some glistening, toned, manly flesh straining in conservatively heroic ways.
If I
continue to be utterly honest, I put off watching this movie for three reasons:
1) I am mentally ill, but, also, 2) I was worried it might be middling, and 3)
I wasn’t sure just how gory and upsetting it would be. I don’t like entrails or
sexual violence all that much, and this sort of stoop-necked, broad-shouldered,
dead-eyed Viking Revenge Epic seemed like it might indulge (and so I watched my
DVD copy for the first go-round to blunt the edge of anything objectionable via
a less clear image). It does have both, but the second especially hangs around
like a phantom just out of frame. I never saw anything directly in my line of
vision, but there are shots of innocents (women and children) being handled in
ways that make you worry about what’s going to happen to them when they’re
off-screen. Maybe it’s deliberate use of the visual language of marauderly
rapaciousness only up to a point or it’s just my paranoia. The violence is much
more visible, but also interestingly not. There is some really gruesome
stuff in the film, but The Northman doesn’t feel like it indulges.
It often depicts and then moves on. The fight scenes are particularly
interesting in this regard because of certain lightly idiosyncratic choices
about what is and isn’t focused on. There’s a degree of obfuscation that you
might interpret as artistry for how it feels like a small act of resistance in
the face of the aforementioned easy pleasures. If I was to sum it up
imprecisely, I would say the undergirding philosophy seems to be that not
every violent act needs to be seen. The temptation would be to hard-lock
the camera (and by extension the audience’s eyes) onto every clash of sharp-edged
weaponry and every gouging of flesh and cut, cut, cut to draw out every last
drop of excitement, tension, and revulsion, but there’s sometimes a surprising
remove that makes me, Le Critic, smile and cross my arms and nod quietly
in enjoyment (cuz there’s something Going On here, visually—or, you know, the
fights are filmed somewhat seamlessly as a flourish and so must be
choreographed in a way that mimes or minimizes blows landing).
In a
similar vein, the dialogue and delivery of said dialogue strike me as
meaning-full—The film is not mirthless at all, but its drama is often
unashamedly straight-faced. Its words are simultaneously wooden and poetic. As
much as it hedges where violence is concerned and compromises
moodiness/strangeness to provide a relatively conventionally enjoyable viewing
experience, its words feel unyielding to me. Whether you see this as Literary
or just… approximately “historical” depends on your predilection, I suppose.
Tonally, such a stance befits a harsh, uncompromising world. This just makes
the magical elements or moments (even if they’re grotesque in some way) feel
more satisfying and full by contrast. My latent fantasy-reading teenager
delighted at the rules governing Amleth’s revenging magic blade, for example:
It can only be drawn at night or at the Gates of Hel, which means Amleth
physically isn’t allowed to use it to kill his uncle ahead of fate’s schedule
when he’s sorely tempted at one point, and when he later has to fight during
the day, he wields the sword sheathed as a bludgeon. As he actively began to
take his revenge through nightly acts of killing, it struck me how we were
witnessing a VVitch-esque folk horror scenario from the perspective of
the monster. The attacks are identified as supernatural by the rattled farm
folk, which lends a sense of strength (and, yes, of coolness as well) to
Amleth’s actions. Rather than fear, we’re meant to delight in the systematic
destruction of uncle Fjölnir’s life, which isn’t all that different from how
the settler family of The VVitch were abused. Amleth’s haunting of his
uncle and the psychological warfare against his household might be my favorite
part of the film for the concept alone.
The
most interesting moment in this—familial—regard (and possibly the most
interesting moment in the film outright) is when Amleth finally manages to meet
with his mother, who has become Fjölnir’s wife, and we learn the truth about
his father’s death—That she was in on it is a fine-enough twist if not
necessarily surprising. What is interesting and moving is how this
conversation demolishes Amleth’s childish understanding of his parents’
relationship. In a way, he has been stuck as a child, never permitted (or
forced?) to undergo the process of disillusionment with the people that raised
him, and which represents a core of recognizable truth about the human
experience beneath the fantastical façade. Literally, he lost his father and
had to leave his mother behind to grow up elsewhere; figuratively, he’s still back
in that clearing where he watched his father die. He took his parents at face
value then and continued to do so into adulthood: his father a good and kind
man (and ruler), his mother a loving wife. That she was a slave and was
assaulted by Aurvandil, whereas she actually loves Fjölnir and has been with
him (and With him) willingly, is a great revelation. Honestly, it might
be needlessly undermined by her propositioning Amleth at the end of their
interaction. Even as likely just a strategy to get him to drop his guard, that
so obviously depraved act makes her a little too wacky and her legitimate
grievances, and their significance, easier to write off. It makes rooting for
her death too easy.
Yet
it’s an interesting subversion for the audience if they think about it—We start
with Fjölnir, with his predictably evil dark hair, versus Aurvandil, with his
good-guy lighter locks, but, in the end, it turns out the former hasn’t done
much of anything the latter didn’t also do. It ultimately adds a tantalizing
theoretical ambivalence to Amleth’s quest for vengeance that’s in practice run
over, roughshod, in the audience’s mind by the fact that we personally are
aligned with Amleth and his interests, so, like him, we’re in this thing to the
bitter end, despite watching him quite early in the movie visit an act
of violence upon a village that doesn’t look so dissimilar to what Fjölnir
wrought back at Hrafnsey. Actually: Fjölnir committed a coup and would conceivably
want to keep a lot of what he conquered, seeing as a kingdom needs people and
as his purpose was to seize power and set up shop, whereas Amleth was a raider,
coldly taking what was valuable while razing the rest before roving on. It’s
not that we aren’t also made aware of his regret, as he zeroes-in on the
structure where the undesirables post-conquest are being burned alive after
witnessing a young boy crying for his mother, and even has a tear-streak-like
smear of blood on his otherwise frigid face to drive the point home, but so
what? Fjölnir is a friggin’ farmer now! Even if it was against his will,
his glory is already gone and he’s left playing at rule in an Icelandic
wasteland. At this point, Amleth is grave -robbing and -defiling. And, again,
the movie knows—When he won’t leave with the under-utilized witch he loves,
Olga, we’re clearly supposed to see the act of returning to finish the revenge
as both heroic and tragic. And perhaps the movie could have leaned harder, atheistically,
on the tragedy. That Amleth could have finally seen the situation at Hrafnsey
for what it was and continued down a path of healing when offered the chance to
just walk away but instead took the predictable, stereotypically masculine,
path to an early grave by refusing to break a child’s oath of absolute loyalty
that was made in (frankly: excusable) ignorance. The promise of a glorious
afterlife for him in Valhöll feels like perhaps too much of a certainty.
I will
acknowledge the Literary value of this depiction—We don’t watch, say,
Shakespeare to see characters make only smart choices, and lots of real people
do let some perceived destiny rule them. There’s a distinctly, deliberately
“traditional” vibe here, seeing, for example, as the film opens with an
invocation and some lines at points throughout struck me as particularly
alliterative or featured hyphenation in stilted but also evocative ways. In the
credits, character roles are identified by names alongside descriptive titles,
like “Finnr The Nose-Stub.” This is arguably not a modern story peddling unacknowledged
toxicity so much as it is a deliberate attempt to recreate something hoary and
formal with slick modern technology (and maybe comment on it a little),
and thus to re-render it as visceral once more for an inattentive,
dopamine-deficient audience. At what point does the obvious epic tragedy become
trite, though? (Does the injection of intermittent trippy-ness, together with
an overall refreshingly guileless approach to the subject matter, redeem it?)
The
boring question I’ll end on—and also a secret fourth reason I was a little
leery of The Northman—is how much this movie might resonate with white
nationalist freaks. Our last image of Olga, with her unassuming garb and blonde
hair and pale skin and twin children, isn’t so different from the sort of
trad-y, retvrn-y, vaguely Viking-adjacent conservative imagery you see staged
or AI-generated online. The woman in the wheat field, barefoot by the cow, a
White babe in a sling round the chest, chickens and toddlers nipping at her vulnerable
pink heels… Maybe it's for the best Amleth died fighting in an active volcano?
(Died fighting naked against his naked uncle in an active
volcano. Between this, the kiss with his mother, and the visual of his father
revealing his war wound and forcing Amleth to touch it as part of an initiation
into manhood, there is an undercurrent of incestuous eroticism in The
Northman. Fjölnir’s final strike is a thrust as the two mutually finish one
another off. Unable to bed nor blast his mother, Amleth instead takes his heat
in hand and abruptly runs through his cousin-brother, the slender and
soft-haired Thórir. He comes back later to impale mother as well.) I guess the
reasonable take would be that we can’t cede the entirety of this culture and
history and iconography, even as abstracted and caricaturized and bastardized
and collaged all to death as it so often is, to racists. Furthermore, I’d
imagine that Eggers as a notorious historical-detail obsessive couldn’t be fond
of the mélange that chuds’ve made of this supposedly quintessentially white
culture as they purport to celebrate and revive it. But still I wonder if the
action could have been a bit less glorious—that final shot of Olga a bit less
idealistic—in the name of undermining in some small way the never-ending
video-game-ification of The Viking. I don’t think the mystical or horrific or…
unconventionally erotic elements would drive the ignoramuses away. The horror
is ultimately empowering rather than exclusively off-putting since it can be of
the unsettling screaming and tendon-straining bloodsport sort, and nationalism
is often at least kind of fruity and also… focused on the family. I don’t know
that the rent-lowering gunshots are effective, I mean! The gunshots might sound
pretty enticing to these weirdos, in fact! Assuming they can hack it with the
doggy roleplay early on—and certain sporadic… undignified moments throughout
(some bear and/or wolf roleplay a bit later?)—there’s a lot here those unsavory
types would like, which, reason be damned, makes me ultimately like The
Northman that bit less.
